Programme OS5b Governing water
towards sustainability abstract 790
Limits to the groundwater governance in California U.S. and Guanajuato
Mexico
Author(s): Gabriela Angeles-Serrano, Boris Marañon
Dr. Boris Marañon, Instituto de
Investigaciones Económicas IIE-UNAM
Keyword(s): groundwater governance, conflicts, Guanajuato, California, shared aquifers
Article:
Poster:
Session: OS5b Governing water
towards sustainability
Abstract Since 1980`s, strategies to increase social participation and the
empowerment of the groups involved in water management have been encouraged, mostly in developing countries
but also in those developed. Meanwhile, some academic circles began to disapprove the recent progress in water
policy. One reason is because the new politics provides too much power to some groups (i.e. organized farmers or
municipalities) even when they may misunderstand the scientific and technical limits of the resource and/or have a
reduced vision of the environmental crisis. So, as the capacity of decision of them is increased, they may refuse to
change their practices to access water, even when the more recent information might indicate that a permanent
degradation is still affecting water resources. This last could be more probable when the groundwater is the most
important resource because of the natural laws that govern the differences in their quantity and quality are more
complex of assimilating by the society, that those that govern the surface water. Although a regulatory framework to
use rationally and to maintain shared water sources requires of interdisciplinary and coordinated approaches in order
to achieve enough support and a consensus between different social agents. Then, to reach legitimacy in water
politics will not be sufficient while big asymmetries of power persist in the vulnerable territories. Additionally the
reduction of the responsibilities of the State, as the maximum authority in the position of allocating the water and at
the same time of protecting to people and the environment, it is allowing to the most powerful groups of avoiding
future restrictions and this leaves completely defenseless to the less powerful agents, when they have in fact, much
less possibilities to access water. Consequently with the new policies, conflicts could come up still and the water
governance could be threatened at long or even middle term. Under the previous context, the objective of this article
is to determine to what extension the progress in policies that incorporate new agents is increasing the cost of the
access to more powerless groups in California US and Guanajuato Mexico. The methodology includes 1) a revision
of the advances in social participation that were motivated because of the modifications in water policy during the last
twenty-five years, 2) the identification of the persistence of power groups as one of the main limitations for the
advance through more comprehensive models of participation and 3) with the information of points 1 and 2 the main
gaps in water policy advances will be shown. It is concluded that the power of some agents, could become one of
the main factors responsible of challenging the preservation of a healthy environment and a more equitable allocation
of available resources.