Programme Poster session 3 abstract 337
“Water is God’s”: Commonality View and the Challenges of State
Institutions in Nigeria
Author(s): Emmanuel M. Akpabio
Emmanuel Akpabio, PhD is a lecturer in the Department
of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Uyo, Nigeria. His research interest is on environment and natural
resources management with emphasis on water resources management. His recent publicat
Keyword(s):
Session: Poster session 3
Abstract The search for
responsible and accountable water management practices has generally overlooked belief systems, perception,
reality and attitudes. Yet these all play a part in sustainable water management most especially in the Third World
Countries. The aim of this paper is to see how such cultural and indigenous issues contend with the formal State
initiatives for efficient water resources management in Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. The study used key contending
State water management principles, namely water rights, cost recovery and environmental sustainability and
compared with local practice to see commonalities and differences. Meetings, interviews, observations and focus
group discussions were used to collect the data. The ideal points for such data collection were the Cross River Basin
Development Authority (CRBDA) projects which served as intersection points between formal, state-based
institutions and the informal community-based practices. In the result, it was observed that the key water
management principles adopted by the State could not fit well with the prevailing local practices and contexts.
Expectedly, the needed cooperation from the locals for those projects was weak and lacking. A number of factors
lent explanations and these bordered on the perception and attitudes to water by the locals and compounded by the
hydrological characteristics of the study areas. For instance, the notion of linking water with the supernatural agency
stultifies any formal efforts at cost recovery. This is likely going to be so in the nearest future given sufficient water
supplies from the natural sources. Since the “scarcity value” has not been appreciated, it is likely that the locals will
continue to perceive any formal water management initiatives as financially taxing rather than improving their overall
conditions. Consistent with the above local impression, the study further observed that current state policies and
programmes on water carry no elements intended for the improvements of the lives of people but meaningless
projects, which is of meaningless impacts on the lives of the intended beneficiaries. A number of recommendations
proffered include inclusive governance that takes on the views of the locals, incentive practices and cost effective
project targeting.