Programme OS6a Economic instruments abstract 291
Economic value of provisioning services and livelihood dependence on the
Ga-Mampa wetland, South Africa
Author(s): Olalekan Adekola(1), Sylvie Morardet(2), Frederic Grelot, Rudolf de
Groot
1) Environmental Systems
Analysis Group, Wageningen UR, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
2) International
Water Management Institute, Southern Africa office, Private Bag X813 Silverton 0127, Pretoria, South Africa and
Cemagref UMR G-EAU,
Keyword(s): economic valuation, livelihood analysis, market valuation, provisioning services, wetland ecosystem
Article:
Poster:
Session: OS6a Economic instruments
Abstract The size of the Ga-Mampa wetland (1 km2), in the Olifants river catchment in
South Africa, was halved between 1996 and 2004. This jeopardizes the ecological integrity and influences the
benefits people obtain from the wetland. This study therefore analysed the economic values of the provisioning
services derived from the Ga-Mampa wetland and evaluated their contribution to the livelihood of local stakeholders.
Using a direct market valuation technique and based on a mix of data collection approaches that include
questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, field observation and measurements and
collection of market prices, we estimated the economic value of the main provisioning services provided by the
wetland (collection of edible plants, crop production, livestock grazing, reeds and sedge collection). The results
show that the contribution of the wetland to the livelihood of local community estimated at an annual net financial
value of $411 per household far exceeds its annual cash income of $35 per household and is of the magnitude of the
average monthly cash income from all sources. Most of the materials harvested from the wetland are used for
household subsistence and are rarely sold. The wetland services are also essential to sustain the social and cultural
responsibilities in gift giving to neighbours and relatives.
The study concludes that the local people are highly
dependent on the wetland ecosystem services but that current use levels exceed sustainability levels, which
jeopardizes the future livelihood of the local people. We therefore recommend that the local stakeholders be
supported in identifying alternative sources of livelihood while simultaneously developing sustainable management
strategies for small wetlands such as Ga-Mampa. In addition, other ecosystem services (regulating, supporting)
provided by the wetland to local and downstream stakeholders need to be further studied and economically
assessed.