Congress Resources: Papers, posters and presentations

< Return to abstract list

The Jordan River Basin: Water, Conflict, Cooperation And Technology

Congress: 2015
Author(s): Megan Boehnke (Missoula, USA)


Keyword(s): Sub-theme 12: Transboundary river basins and shared aquifers,
AbstractThe Jordan River Basin: Water, Conflict, Cooperation and Technology Megan M Boehnke GMA Consultant, Boehnke Water Consulting 7233 Uncle Robert Lane Apt 3 Missoula, MT 59803 USA megan.boehnke@gmail.com 1 406 529 3260 The scarcity of water in the Middle East is creating political and security issues. Specifically, in the Jordon River Basin the competing claims, water usage and water rights, have affected all of the riparian's resources. This in turn has increased the strategic importance of water. For the Middle Eastern states, already involved in conflict or on the edge of one, water has become a catalyst for confrontation. To date, controversies between states concerning water rights remain unresolved despite formulating agreements in an effort to come to peace over this precious resource. In fact, there is no multilateral international treaty in force dealing with the allocation of the water resources of international drainage basins. Water scarcity has become an issue of national security since the remapping of the Middle East. Basin-wide cooperation will be required to come to a resolution and the use of technology will be integral to the solution. Cooperation and technology were the methods that I studied to help resolve the security issue in the Jordon River Basin. These methods have the potential to help provide relief for these water scare states and eliminate conflict over this resource. Cooperation was studied by going through water proposals, plans, and agreements beginning with Abraham Burkart's proposals for water resources in 1901. Because of the tense relationships, the states have come up with other means to provide water to the populations that does not involve the other riparian's. Desalinization and water harvesting are the two major technological methods looked at. Use of desalinization has been relatively limited by states in the basin. However, other states in the region, such as Saudi Arabia, have utilized this method extensively. My research revealed that water harvesting has been used for over 2000 years in deserts communities to provide water for agriculture. In studying, the political relations between states in the river basin, it was observed that a major factor of the political tension is the issue of water management. Over the years the states, which recognize Israel have created agreements that have set up guidelines for regulating and preserving the Jordon River Basin. In review of those documents there are certain trends that can be found. Most of the plans and agreements that have been created are exclusive to the states involved. Each of these agreements has identified issues that need to be address. The problem is that with each agreement and plan, states have acted unilaterally or bilaterally, which has resulted in none of plans being fully embraced. Even with these agreements, the states are experiencing a growing water deficiency. States that do not recognize Israel, such as Lebanon and Syria, have an extremely complex and tense relationship as riparian neighbors. These two different relationships with Israel reveal vastly different approaches to water management. Neither approach to addressing water scarcity has led these riparian's to a peaceful resolution. Instead of collaborating, states are finding their own way to provide water for their populations by using technology. Desalinization is becoming increasingly important in the basin, which is supplied by a number of aquifers. The aquifers are supplied by ground and surface water sources that are losing volume. As the aquifers are drained at an accelerated rate, they either dry up or pull in seawater. This increases the salinity of the water and renders it relatively useless for human purposes without treatment. Investments are being made in treatment plants for the desalination of brackish water thereby restoring it to a useful state. Water harvesting is the other method that is important in the region. Water harvesting is the collection of rainfall over a relatively geographic large area that can be utilized for agriculture. It is a much less expensive way to increase the water supply than desalinization and is something the people can do themselves without significant investment in infrastructure. Either of these methods would help provide relief while reliving pressure in the geo-political conflict that plagues the region. In summary, states have acted in their own interest and this has led to conflicts in the past over water and continues to do so today, thus posing a security threat in the region. The conflicts in the Jordon River Basin will continue to escalate as the water scarcity grows unless there is a change in approach. With booming populations and the scarcity of water, it is incumbent upon each state to come up with ways to form alliances and a system of rules to protect the water resources, so as to provide for the future. Technology is providing states with the means to provide water for their populations. These states must use technology and political cooperation to effectively implement agreements amongst on another, which address the sharing and use of water. This will provide for an increased supply and decrease the risk of major conflict over this precious resource in the Jordon River Basin. 1. Al-Atrush, Samer (May 12, 2010) "Egypt won't give up one drop of Nile water rights." AFP. 2. Allan , J. A. (2002) The Middle East Water Question: Hydropolitics and the Global Economy, London: I.B. Tauris & Co. 3. Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation Planning Sector. January 2005. National Water Resources Plan for Egypt – 2017. Cairo: Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation Planning Sector. 4. Attili, Shaddad, Phillips, David, Khalaf, Adla. (2010). History of Water Politics and Plans of the Jordan River Basin. 2010. < www.nad-plo.org/userfiles/file/Reports/howb.pdf> accessed on October 14, 2010. 5. Bank Information Center. 2011. Red Sea-Dead Sea Conduit Project. 2010. < http://www.bicusa.org/en/Project.58.aspx> , accessed June 1, 2010. 6. Beaumont, Peter (1998) "Restructuring of Water Usage in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin: The Impact of Modern Water Management Policies." Yale F&Es Bulletin 103:168-186 7. Bolz, Veronika and Rohrmeier, Majka (2002) Case Study: Euphrates and Tigris, 8. Presentation at ETH Seminar: Science and Politics of International Freshwater Management, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology. 9. Bruch, Carl and Altman, Stephanie, Al-Moumin, Mishkat and Troell, Jessica, Roffman and Elena (2007) "Legal Frameworks Governing Water in the Middle East and North Africa." International Journal of Water Resources Development 23:595-624. 10. Clawson, Patrick. 1996. The Middle East Forum. Middle East Quarterly. "The Middle East, with Water to Waste", , accessed on November 15, 2010. 11. Darwish, Adel (1994). Water, Lecture, Conference on Environment and Quality of Life, Geneva 12. Dees, Joseph L. (1959) "Jordan’s East Ghor Canal Project" Middle East Journal 13:357-371 13. El-Sadek, Alaa (2009) "Water desalination: An imperative measure for water security in Egypt." Desalination, 250:876-884. 14. Gat, Moshe (2005) "The Great Powers and the Water Dispute in the Middle East: A Prelude to the Six Day War." Middle Eastern Studies 41:911-935 15. Gleick, Peter H (1993) "Water and Conflict." International Security 18:112. 16. Gruen, George (2006) "Efforts to Fulfill the Growing Water Needs of Israelis and Palestinians." American Foreign Policy Interests 28:119-142. 17. Hakki, Murat Metin (2006) "Turkey, Water and the Middle East: Some Issues Lying Ahead." Chinese Journal of International Law 5: 441-458. 18. Hambright, Karl and Ragep, F. Jamil and Gint, Joseph (2006) Water in the Middle East: Cooperation and Technological Solutions in the Jordan Valley. U.S. Edition. Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. 19. Hudes, Karen. 2010. Shared Water Resources in the Jordan River Basin. 2010. < http://www.gonzagajil.org/pdf/volume1/Hudes/Hudes.pdf>, accessed February 23, 2011. 20. IASPS Jerusalem & Washington. 2010. Division for Research in Strategy. The New Water Politics of the Middle East, 1999. < http://www.iasps.org/strategic/water.htm>, accessed October 15, 2010. 21. International Law Association. 2010. The Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers, 1966. http://www.unece.org/env/water/meetings/legal_board/2010/annexes_groundwater_paper/Annex_II_Helsinki_Rues_ILA.pdf, accessed on October 17, 2010. 22. Israel-Palestine Water Issues. 2011. Mountain and Coastal Aquifers. 2010.< http://mapsomething.com/demo/waterusage/hydrology.php>, accessed May 12, 2011. 23. Jägerskog Anders and Granit, Jakob and Lofgren, Rebecca and Weyler, Elin and Bullock, Andy and de Gooijer, George and Pettigrew, Stuart (2009). Water Resources in the Middle East, Background Report. Stockholm International Water Institute. 24. Jobson, Suki (2003) "Briefing Paper No. 4: Water of Strife." The Royal Institute of International Affairs. 25. Jordan Sights. 2011. About Jordan. 2011. < http://www.jordansights.com/aboutjordan.aspx>, accessed May 24, 2011. 26. Kameri-Mbote, Patricia (2007) "Water, Conflict, and Cooperation: Lessons From the Nile River Basin." Navigating Peace. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. 27. Karagiannis, Ioannis C. and Soldatos, Petros G. (2008) "Water Desalination Cost Literature: Review and Assessment." Desalinization 223: 448-456 28. Kibaroglu, Aysegul (2008) "The Role of Epistemic Communities in Offering New Cooperation 29. Frameworks in the Euphrates-Tigris River Systems." Journal of International Affairs 61:183-198. 30. Klawitter, Simone, Quazzaz, Hadeel (2005) "Water and a Human Right: The Understanding of Water in the Arab Countries of the Middle East." Water Resources Development 21:253-271. 31. Kliot, Nurit (2007) Water Resources and Conflict in the Middle East. London: Taylor & Francis. 32. Libiszewski, Stephan (1995) "Water Disputes in the Jordan Basin Region and their Role in the Resolution of the Arab-Israeli Conflict." Center for Security Policy and Conflict Research/ Swiss Peace Foundation ENCOP. 33. McCaffrey, Stephen C. (2003) The Law of International Watercourses, Non-Navigational Uses, London: Oxford University Press. 34. Middle East Post. 2011. SFG Report on Water in ME – Blue Peace. 2011. < http://www.middleastpost.com/2734/sfg-report-water-blue-peace/>, accessed May 29, 2011. 36. Mohsen, Mousa S. (2007) "Water strategies and potential of desalination in Jordan." Desalination 203:27-46 37. Oren, Michael B. (2002) Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East. Oxford University Press, USA. 38. Palestinian Academic Society for the study of International Affairs. 2011. Water. < http://www.passia.org/publications/bulletins/water-eng/pages/water04.pdf> , accessed June 10, 2011.
2011 IWRA - International Water Resources Association office@iwra.org - http://www.iwra.org - Admin